Efficiency Rating

Efficiency Rating (ER) is a calibrated measure of demonstrated impact within a defined area of influence.

ER does not measure your value as a person. It measures the impact you demonstrate through real work, decisions, outcomes, and evidence.

Evidence-based Outcome-oriented Context-aware Evolving

Section 1

What does ER actually answer?

ER helps answer one focused question: 'What impact can this person demonstrate in the area they can actually influence?'

Area of Influence

↓

Action

↓

Outcome

↓

Evidence

↓

ER

A person should not be measured against an outcome they cannot realistically influence.

Example

A planner should not automatically be measured by total production tons if the planner does not directly control production. ER should reflect the person's actual area of influence.

Section 2

What ER measures

These are not isolated personal traits. They are dimensions used to understand demonstrated impact from real work.

Impact

How significant was the change created?

Evidence

How strong and verifiable is the proof?

Repeatability

Can the result be reproduced consistently?

Complexity

How difficult or complex was the problem?

Value

What value was created, protected, recovered, or enabled?

Waste Elimination

How much unnecessary effort, time, cost, delay, or complexity was removed?

Section 3

ER starts with real work

ER is not something you claim. ER is something you demonstrate.

Observation

↓

Action

↓

Outcome

↓

Evidence

↓

Demonstrated Impact

↓

ER

ER becomes meaningful when a person has real evidence of what they have done. Examples of evidence:

Problem solvedProcess improvedDecision madeWaste removedCapacity recoveredTime savedQuality improvedRisk avoidedValue createdImprovement repeated successfully

Section 4

Show what you created.

ER should not be based only on self-declaration. Evidence is what turns a claim into demonstrated impact.

Claim

"I improved the process."

Evidence

  • Before: X
  • Action: Y
  • After: Z
  • Evidence: verified measurement

Don't just claim impact. Show the evidence.

Section 5

ER is dynamic

ER should evolve as demonstrated capability evolves. It should not be permanently fixed.

Demonstrated Work

↓

New Evidence

↓

Calibration

↓

Updated ER

New evidence can:

  • Strengthen the signal
  • Demonstrate repeatability
  • Show increased complexity handled
  • Demonstrate broader impact
  • Reveal new areas of capability

One successful action should not automatically define a person's entire capability. Repeated demonstrated results are stronger evidence than a single isolated achievement.

Section 6

ER and area of influence

ER should always be interpreted in context. The same person can demonstrate different levels of impact in different areas.

Planning ER
Warehouse ER
Problem Solving ER
Process Improvement ER
Leadership / Collaboration evidence

Do not imply that one number completely defines a person. The context matters.

Section 7

ER is not about working more

More work does not automatically mean more impact. Sometimes the strongest result comes from eliminating unnecessary work.

Automate a repetitive task
Remove unnecessary approvals
Eliminate repeated manual checks
Reduce waiting
Prevent recurring failures
Simplify a process

Less unnecessary effort

+

Better or equal outcome

=

Higher Efficiency Impact

The goal is not to reward people for being busy. The goal is to recognize people who create better outcomes.

Section 8

ER and learning

ER should not only look backward. It should support learning.

Before

↓

Action

↓

After

↓

Evidence

↓

Learning

The learning can become future evidence of capability. This means ER can become stronger through demonstrated learning and repeated application.

Section 9

ER levels

ER calibration is currently being developed and validated through real-world evidence.

Conceptual ER scale — methodology under development

0–39

Emerging Impact

40–64

Strong Impact

65–84

High Impact

85–100

Exceptional Impact

These thresholds are conceptual and not final. The methodology will be refined as more real-world evidence is collected.

Section 10

ER example

One simple real-world example of how demonstrated impact becomes evidence of capability.

1

Problem

A process repeatedly creates unnecessary waiting.

2

Observe

The waiting occurs repeatedly.

3

Understand

The delay is caused by a specific process dependency.

4

Action

The dependency is redesigned.

5

Outcome

Waiting time decreases.

6

Evidence

Before/after measurements confirm the improvement.

7

Repeatability

The improvement remains stable over time.

8

ER

The demonstrated impact becomes evidence of capability.

ER helps turn professional activity into evidence of demonstrated capability.

For the person

Understand what you actually create and where you have demonstrated capability.

For the organization

Understand where people create measurable impact and where capability exists.

For talent discovery

See demonstrated capability instead of relying only on CV and LinkedIn claims.

The individual is not the product. ER exists to make demonstrated capability more visible and understandable.

Don't tell us what you can do. Show us what you have demonstrated.

ER does not define your value. It makes your demonstrated impact visible.